On the 11th November 2011 the Russian and WTO working parties agreed
terms to pave the way for Russia's acceptance to the World Trade
Organisation. Russian lawmakers approved membership on the 22nd August
2012.
The path to membership has, to put it lightly, been arduous. Original negotiations started in 1993 and were ongoing ever since.
Following
his successful presidential election in 2000, Vladimir Putin got behind
the accession plans and was a key player in the eventual outcome. He
displayed his frustrations more than once at the negotiations and how
"the rules of the game" were changed to suit different WTO partners.
Although
the WTO is ostensibly an apolitical global trade organisation, the
delays and barriers that Russia has dealt with in recent years have been
politically charged.
Prior to the agreement, Vladimir Putin said in a recent Chinese TV interview;
"We
want to join the World Trade Organisation. This is our goal and our
objective. In our opinion this would have a generally positive impact on
the Russian economy, mostly because it will increase the level of trust
in the economy, and on the administrative and legal procedures within
the economy. By the way, we have fully adjusted our domestic legislation
to WTO requirements. We have done this. We have also settled the major
problems with all of the key partners. I think that it has become more
of a political issue."
He was less diplomatic when interviewed on
Russian TV when he lambasted the EU and USA for procrastination and for
causing deliberate delays to Russian accession. This back drop is
against open hostility to Russia by some US lawmakers who wrote to the
US WTO Trade Representative on the 10th November about their
'significant concerns' and demanding that Russia display "transparent,
substantive and prompt action" in its' adherence to WTO obligations.
"Substantive"
could be used as a Russian accolade but neither 'transparency' nor
'prompt' are virtues I see much of in the Federation.
As an
organisation the WTO supervises and liberalises international trade,
regulating trade between member countries and providing the negotiating
and trade agreements platform.
Importantly for Russian success and
her ability to attract fresh inward investment, the WTO enforces
dispute resolution aimed at member's adherence to WTO agreements.
The
WTO has 153 members and represents more than 97% of the world's
population so Russia's absence since the fall of the USSR has been
anachronistic. With a $1.5 trillion GDP and as the world's largest oil
and gas producer Russia should have been in the WTO years earlier.
Membership
of the WTO will not change the business environment or the high risk
assessment given to Russia by foreign investors. What it should do is
add impetus to the significant reform and efficiency drives and reflect
the seriousness the Russian government places on combating inefficiency,
corruption and cronyism.
Look at the closure of hundreds of
customs posts, the dismissal of many customs officers and the opening of
new import facilities to promote faster, fairer growth plus the
billions of dollars attracted from the auto and pharmaceutical sectors
in the last 12 months.
There is no doubt that membership is good
for Russia. It brings much-needed capital to the Russian markets.
Strained relations with the West followed the 2008 five-day Georgian
conflict and, in the seven months following hostilities, investors
pulled $300 billion out of Russia. In 2011 further outflow reached $70
billion against a $36 billion forecast by the Russian central bank.
According
to the World Bank, Russian WTO membership will bring both sustainable
and incremental annual economic growth of 2% and this success is
measured against the backdrop of shrinkage and uncertainty in the global
markets. Russia joining the WTO is the 'good news' the world markets
are looking for following the WTO failure at Doha, the incessant
Euro-zone doom and unremitting, depressing news from the US markets.
The
consensus to join the WTO (the final barrier fell when Russia and
Georgia signed an agreement approving Russia's WTO entry on November 9
in Geneva, after both agreed on international monitoring on the disputed
crossings with South Ossetia and Abkhazia) came only weeks after
Vladimir Putin confirmed his return to the Russian Presidency on
September 24th.
Following this consensus the rouble was the
strongest performing of the top 25 currencies, having gained over 5%
against the US dollar. The Russian stock market gained over 15% in what
has been the world's biggest jump and Russian oil jumped 7% in the same
period.
Whether WTO accession is good in the immediate term for
smaller or inefficient industries is another story. Fears are rife that
cheap imports will flood the market and 'small' Russian industry will
suffer. Quite who and what these 'small' industries are, I do not know.
Russia today is a huge importer of consumer goods and distributors may
find they have fresh competition on their hands but the absence of a
cottage industry begs the question.
Russia exported over $400
billion in 2010 predominantly to the EU, Ukraine, Turkey, China and
Belarus. WTO membership opens up new markets where historically Russian
products have been blocked. Russian steel and iron manufacturers have
been vocal supporters of Russian accession and will be major
beneficiaries as trade barriers are lowered and Russian products allowed
access, if not actually welcomed to the new markets. General imports
were valued at nearly $250 billion
Maxim Medvedkov, the chief
Russian negotiator to the WTO, said "More than one third of our GDP is
made abroad... we are seventh in the world in terms of exports. We need a
stable predictable instrument to develop trade".
European
companies are initially best positioned to take advantage from Russia's
WTO entry. EU business prevails in Russia's external trade and has been
integrated for longer than other blocs. In the short term U.S.
opportunities are constrained because of the Jackson-Vanik amendment,
but as Jackson-Vanik violates WTO membership, Russia will have to be
released very quickly. For all the U.S. political blustering and anti
Russian sentiment, Jackson-Vanik will go by default or U.S. companies
will miss opportunities.
No comments:
Post a Comment